Re: DMM WG next steps

Also, I propose to include the following text. Based on the discussions we had in the NETEXT WG meet on last Friday, I assume Brian and the DMM chairs agreed in principle agreed to allow any PMIPv6 maintenance related extensions to be completed in DMM WG. Once the NETEXT closes, we will have a single mobility working group and that will be DMM, just as we had MEXT in the past.

"The DMM working group will also allow extensions to the Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol, specified in RFC 5213 and RFC 5844. These extensions are maintenance-oriented and incremental in nature. Primarily to address any protocol gaps required to support  deployments and other standards development organizations using the Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol in their system architectures."

Regards
Sri






From: Alper Yegin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:04 AM
To: Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM WG next steps

Jouni,

Thanks for the text.


      DMM can be used to realise such a distributed deployment
      model, by distributing mobility functions more closer to the user.


This part excludes the approaches that place the mobility function on or near the CN.

I recommend the following revision:



      DMM can be used to realise such a distributed deployment
      model, by distributing mobility functions more closer to the user
      and/or its corresponding nodes.

Alper






On Mar 5, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:

Folks,

DMM WG has done some progress lately. The requirements document has
already left the building and the gap analysis is heading to WGLC as
we speak. It is about the time to think what we should do next now
that we have grown out of the infancy.

A smaller group of mobility enthusiasts have been discussing about
possible next steps and how the possible new charter would look like.
The current very draft text template can be found here:
https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter

As you can see, we are still in early stages and all input it welcome.
Obviously, possible re-chartering depends on many things. For example,
things like getting the gap analysis out of the WG and what the IESG
says. Nothing has been fixed or decided yet. Anyhow, we will start the
discussion on re-chartering with the expectation that the DMM WG will
re-charter and continue developing new solutions and/or enhancements
in the IP mobility space.

- Jouni & Dapeng

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm