Re: DMM WG next steps
"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CF471E9B.1209B1%[email protected]> |
On 3/13/14 3:05 AM, "Jouni Korhonen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >On Mar 12, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) ><[email protected]> wrote: > > >This is/was my understanding as well. I would, however, emphasise the >the word "maintenance". There is a difference between a new protocol >work and maintaining a protocol. I'd say, incremental extensions for ensuring deployment continuity and SDO support. But, I agree, we don't design a NG StarTrek, all that action already exists in DMM :), we dare not go there with this.