Re: DMM WG next steps
Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1A1F5DDA-B31E-419E-9A87-2AC29FB9A981__24687.1063289747$1394726703$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
On Mar 13, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 3/13/14 3:05 AM, "Jouni Korhonen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 12, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> This is/was my understanding as well. I would, however, emphasise the >> the word "maintenance". There is a difference between a new protocol >> work and maintaining a protocol. > > > I'd say, incremental extensions for ensuring deployment continuity and SDO > support. But, I agree, we don't design a NG StarTrek, all that action That is maintenance in my eyes. - Jouni > already exists in DMM :), we dare not go there with this. > > >