Re: re-charter text updated
Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1502BDF5-6189-4297-8479-05B3345AC96A__5149.86422281272$1395109232$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Folks, Triggered by the question from Behcet, we should come up with the milestones. Few proposals: o The deployment models and scenarios I-D is obvious. o Anchor selection I-D is obvious. Could we also bundle the re-anchoring solution into this one or should it be a different I-D? o Mobility state exposing I-D. This would communication between the end host and the network. Maybe also covering the missing parts within the end host.. Are we OK with one I-D or how people want to see this? o .. - Jouni On Mar 17, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > I have updated the charter draft text slightly: > https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt > > Basically: > > Added Sri's comment on PMIPv6 maintenance. > Added Alper's comment of location of mobility functions. > Added links to other IETF WGs on possible mobility enabling technologies. > Added a comment that virtualised network functions are in scope. > > - Jouni