Re: re-charter text updated

Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <1502BDF5-6189-4297-8479-05B3345AC96A__5149.86422281272$1395109232$gmane$org@gmail.com>
Folks,

Triggered by the question from Behcet, we should come up with the 
milestones. Few proposals:

o The deployment models and scenarios I-D is obvious.
o Anchor selection I-D is obvious. Could we also bundle
  the re-anchoring solution into this one or should it be
  a different I-D?
o Mobility state exposing I-D. This would communication 
  between the end host and the network. Maybe also covering 
  the missing parts within the end host.. Are we OK with one
  I-D or how people want to see this?
o ..

- Jouni


On Mar 17, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> I have updated the charter draft text slightly:
> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
> 
> Basically:
> 
> Added Sri's comment on PMIPv6 maintenance.
> Added Alper's comment of location of mobility functions.
> Added links to other IETF WGs on possible mobility enabling technologies.
> Added a comment that virtualised network functions are in scope.
> 
> - Jouni
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.