Re: re-charter text updated

+1

Regards,

Behcet


On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Ryuji Wakikawa <[email protected]>wrote:

> Jouni
>
> It’s good to see some room for non-MIP based solution in DMM;-)
>
> One clarification, the charter said following
>
>       "Specifically, when solutions are not
>       based on IP mobility protocols, the DMM workingvgroup shall cooperate
>       with other IETF working groups working on other technologies that
>       might allow the mobility of an end host. These working groups include
>       but are not limited to I2rs, Lisp, and Forces."
>
> If we need to extend existing non-MIP protocols, it is reasonable to
> do extension in the working group owning the protocol. I agree on the
> charter.
>
> However, DMM should work on documenting “how to use it”.  The document
> should
> be informational or experimental.  Is this scope of DMM?
>
> btw, you may add IDR in the listed of working group.
>
> thanks
> ryuji
>
>
> 2014/03/17 午後3:41、Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> のメール：
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I have updated the charter draft text slightly:
> >
> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
> >
> > Basically:
> >
> > Added Sri's comment on PMIPv6 maintenance.
> > Added Alper's comment of location of mobility functions.
> > Added links to other IETF WGs on possible mobility enabling technologies.
> > Added a comment that virtualised network functions are in scope.
> >
> > - Jouni
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmm mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm