Re: re-charter text updated
"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CF50BE3C.123C92%[email protected]> |
On 3/20/14 5:54 AM, "Peter McCann" <[email protected]> wrote: >I think our extensions should be to the prefix information option and not >DHCP. > >The properties of an address may change after a handover and we should >not couple >the DHCP state machine (which is about lease renewal) to the handover >state machine. Hi Pete, This is a good comment. If we are making any assumption that even after a handover, the DHCP transactions are still hitting the same DHCP server node, this may be a valid concern. But, if DHCP transactions are locally terminated after handover (Ex: RFC5844/MAG), then the updated properties can be provided as part of the new DHCP transaction. Some parameters such as MTU settings do change after an handover and so we can probably agree that address properties can change as well. Regards Sri