Re: rechartering draft text updated
Alper Yegin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8A3C3E3E-9BDF-4C1C-A9E6-CBEAEB0CCEF4__35189.7813998677$1395857508$gmane$org@yegin.org> |
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Alper Yegin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jouni, >> >> DMM can be used to realise such a distributed deployment >> model, by distributing forwarding functions at optimal location; for >> example, closer either to the mobile user or the corresponding node. >> >> >> s/user/node > > Ack. > >> >> >> Although the maintenance of stable home address(es) and/or prefix(es) >> and upper level sessions is a desirable goal when mobile hosts/routers >> change their point of attachment to the Internet, it is not a strict >> requirement. Mobile hosts/routers should not assume that IP >> addressing including home address(es) and/or home network prefix(es) >> remain the same throughout the entire upper level session lifetime, >> or that support for mobility functions is provided on the network side >> in all conditions, unless these properties are specifically indicated >> to the mobile node and its applications from the network. >> >> Is this trying to say "the network may not be able to provide a stable IP address to the MN"? >> Even in the presence of a DMM solution? > > Yes.. it is imho a valid use case that the mn just does not care all addresses having mobility. The DMM solution may provide stable address only for a subset of addresses available for the mn. > >> >> Mar 2014 - Submit 'The deployment models and scenarios' submitted to the IESG. >> To be Informational RFC. >> Marc 2014 - Submit 'Enhanced gateway and mobility anchor selection' submitted to the >> IESG. To be Proposed Standard. >> >> I guess these are meant to be 2015. > > Uhh.. yes. (copy-paste is always dangerous) > >> >> Btw, the milestones do not seem to have an item to cover for "Forwarding path and signalling management" > > Not at this point. Two reasons: I could not figure a good name for the milestone and also was a bit concerned whether we would have all the energy to work on this many documents in parallel. > Jouni, that is the essential deliverable of the DMM WG, IMO. Alper > - Jouni > > >> >> Thanks Jouni >> >> Alper >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mar 26, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> Take a look at the latest revision. I have added the initial stab >>> for the milestones. Comments and flames are welcome. If you want >>> something to be changed, just propose text & diff. You might also >>> want to say why the change is needed. >>> >>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt >>> >>> - Jouni >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >