Re: rechartering draft comments

On 3/27/14 2:26 PM, "Jouni Korhonen" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>You know that it just happens to be the only RFC even attempting to
>explain
>how LMAs are selected dynamically. If the reference here is contentious,
>I am
>happy to remore it.. just give me alternative text.


I agree. RFC6097 and RFC6463 are relevant to the above work item. It is
possible the WG may (most likely) adopt newer approaches for gateway
selection, but a reference to the prior work is very much relevant. It is
a very relevant reference. We do want to leverage work where possible. I'm
fine with this.



Regards
Sri