Re: Questions on draft-matsushima-stateless-uplane-vepc-02

Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CAC8QAcdfHOLFivoTyYYwCLpwEZYHiY8EVsV+jiHvgRZW3yUE8A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Satoru,

It seems most issues are resolved, except one below.

Regards,

Behcet

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Satoru Matsushima
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Behcet, thanks for clarifying more clearly. :)
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> -- snip --
>
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, I'm sure that RR/RS just only know about
>> > routes, nor whole mobility information exists. When I see a node which
>> > plays
>> > MME role, the node could also be a BGP speaker to export the mobility
>> > info
>> > transformed to the routes.
>> >
>>
>> So MME should be BGP speaker?
>> If not then what would happen?
>>
>
> Precisely, say MME, which 3GPP defined mobility management entity, doesn't
> have the BGP function. IMO, If the entity can be coexist with BGP in a
> single node, an interface for exposing/retrieving mobility information would
> be required between them.
>
>
>>
>> > What do you mean by "topologically incorrect"?
>> > Is that the assigned prefixes are disordered to be aggregated?
>> >
>>
>> Yes. UE moves to another EPC-E which supports a different prefix than UE
>> has?
>> You need to keep host-based prefixes as routes, is there another way?
>>
>
> In the draft, as long as an UE keeps same prefix during hand-over among
> EPC-E routers, those routers belong to a same group that is expected to
> preserve same prefix for the UE. It should be initial attach when the UE is
> attached to different EPC-E and assigned different prefix from previous one.
> Please read section 3.3 and 3.4 of the draft.
>

Attach is OK but I am talking about handover. In Section 3.4 you say:
Thus, UE's address
   is unchanged even after handover.

I don't understand your statement
those routers belong to a same group that is expected to
 preserve same prefix for the UE.

I think you mentioned this before in another conversation that EPC-E's
will be assigned prefixes based on geographical division. If a UE
moves to a different region, how could the routers preserve the same
prefix for the UE without host routes or host prefixes?

Regards,

Behcet
> cheers,
> --satoru
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.