Re: rechartering

Alper,

5/29/2014 11:17 PM, Alper Yegin kirjoitti:
> Hello Jouni, folks,
>
> Here are few more comments:
>
>        DMM can be used to realise such a distributed deployment
>        model, by distributing forwarding functions at optimal location; for
>        example, closer either to the mobile user or the corresponding node.
>
> We had already talked about that: s/mobile user/mobile node.

Ack.

>
>
>
>       o Enhanced gateway & mobility anchor selection and re-selection:
> define
>          protocol solutions for a gateway and mobility anchor selection that
>          go beyond what has been, for example, described in RFC 6097. The
>          solution should also define a mechanism for anchor re-selection
> that allow
>          preserving ongoing mobility sessions in a single administrative
> domain.
>
>        o Forwarding path and signalling management: the mobility agent
> that handles
>          the mobility signalling interacts with the network elements in
> the DMM network
>          for managing the forwarding state associated with a mobile
> node's IP traffic.
>          These two functions may or may not be collocated. Furthermore,
> the forwarding
>          state may also be distributed into multiple network elements
> instead of a
>          single anchor like network element. Define required protocol
> extensions to
>          allow described forwarding path and signalling management.
>
> GW selection and data-path management signaling may be defined in the
> same "solution" document. In at least some cases these are provided as
> part of the same solution set. They may also be separable, maybe, but we
> shall not be hung up on producing separate documents for these… The
> solution discussions will guide us… (no specific change required on the
> above text, more on this below…)
>
>
> The milestones are missing any document that defines the "data-path
> management signaling" (what's mentioned above). And like I said before,
> that's "the"  product of this WG IMO. It'd of course be supplemented by
> GW selection and mobility state exposure bits to complete the picture.
>
> Let's add another milestone:
>
> Nov 2014 - Submit 'Forwarding path and signaling management' as a
> working group document. To be Proposed Standard.
> Mar 2015 - Submit 'Forwarding path and signaling management' submitted
> to the IESG. To be Proposed Standard.

Ack. Somewhat ambitious timeline though ;)

- Jouni


>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alper
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 27, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>
>>
>> Now that the gap analysis I-D is almost on the stage of leaving the WG
>> and the requirements I-D has almost completed IESG, it would be time
>> to return to the rechartering topic.
>>
>> First, the latest revision can be found at:
>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter
>>
>> Second, have a look at it. There are few changes proposed by Alper
>> eons ago and corrected milestones pointed by Behcet.
>>
>> Third, let us get this finally done..
>>
>> - Jouni
>>
>> 4/22/2014 3:55 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Sorry for letting this topic to rot in a dark for the couple of last
>>> weeks. I'll crank out a revision shortly..
>>>
>>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>