Re: rechartering
Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bechet, All what we discuss here has been discussed 2-4 months ago already. Repeating myself: propose concrete text & change snippets. - Jouni 5/30/2014 12:29 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: > About two months ago I had made this proposal > > First cycle, select one from each category of solutions, client, > network based and routing based > Second cycle, select one from the selected ones as the dmm solution. > > which still stands, I think. > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Bechet, >> >> 5/29/2014 11:52 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: >> >>> Hi Jouni, >>> >>> I was looking at the charter text and noticed one important issue. The >>> charter seems to be stuck with the good old anchor think. Almost all >>> text is about anchoring, anchor selection, anchor reselection, and so >>> on. >>> >>> However in the past several months, we have seen in Alper's events, >>> presentations which seem to have no anchor. >>> >>> I don't see any active draft that talks about the anchors. >>> >>> In view of this, my question is how are we going to go ahead with this >>> charter and meet the deadlines? >> >> >> I (myself) see still value dragging along some anchoring stuff just to allow >> smoother migration from current deployed models toward less centralized >> architectures. >> >> But you are right that we should not get stuck on those.. and that has not >> been the intent either. >> >> >>> Or else, are we better off with a charter text which is much less >>> dependent on the anchors, something which could make it possible to >>> progress one of those proposals?? >> >> >> You are welcome to propose concrete text & change snippets to the current >> charter text. >> >> - Jouni >> >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Behcet >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Now that the gap analysis I-D is almost on the stage of leaving the WG >>>> and >>>> the requirements I-D has almost completed IESG, it would be time to >>>> return >>>> to the rechartering topic. >>>> >>>> First, the latest revision can be found at: >>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter >>>> >>>> Second, have a look at it. There are few changes proposed by Alper eons >>>> ago >>>> and corrected milestones pointed by Behcet. >>>> >>>> Third, let us get this finally done.. >>>> >>>> - Jouni >>>> >>>> 4/22/2014 3:55 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti: >>>> >>>>> Folks, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for letting this topic to rot in a dark for the couple of last >>>>> weeks. I'll crank out a revision shortly.. >>>>> >>>>> - Jouni & Dapeng >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dmm mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm