Re: draft charter text updates in github..
Jouni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A99E59CA-195F-4C00-92F4-31221EDB6B32__43593.1052816615$1402067190$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Good point Alper. Lets hash that anchor reselection details out shortly. -- Jouni Korhonen Broadcom (Sent from my mobile..) > Alper Yegin <[email protected]> kirjoitti 6.6.2014 kello 17.37: > > Hello Jouni, DMM folks, > > We better clarify what "anchor re-selection" stands for. > If it is about selecting different anchors for different IP flows, that's one thing. > If it is about changing the IP anchor in the middle of an IP flow, that's another thing. And that other thing needs to be scoped out. A basic understanding of a use case would be appreciated (just an explanation for discussion, I'm not asking for another I-D!), and identification of various aspects of that scenario which translate to work items for DMM WG. > > I won't be in the call today. So, consider this for a discussion. Follow up on the mailing list afterwards would be good. > > Cheers, > > Alper > > > >> On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> Minor changes.. >> >> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt >> >> IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution from legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-) >> >> I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals received from others. >> >> - Jouni >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >