Re: draft charter text updates in github..

Hi Jouni,

>      The DMM solutions primarily target at IPv6 deployments and should not
>      be tailored specifically to support IPv4, in particular in situations
>      where private IPv4 addresses and/or NATs are used. At least IPv6 is
>      assumed to be present in both the mobile host/router and the access
>      networks.

I would like that solutions that work when IPv6 is not present in the
access networks are also in-scope for the charter. Consider deployment
of IPv6 in mobile hosts/routers within an autonomous system that may
be many years away from providing IPv6 to the access networks. If the
solution works equally well when the access network is IPv4-only vs
IPv6-enabled, then shouldn't it also be in-scope for the charter?

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]