Re: draft charter text updates in github..

Charlie,

Thanks Charlie for all the editorials. I have incoporated most. 
Additional comments inline.

6/12/2014 12:24 AM, Charles E. Perkins kirjoitti:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I reviewed the charter, and found numerous little stylistic
> improvements.  Most of my revisions were along the lines of
> rewording the same thought to eliminate ambiguity or make
> grammatical corrections.  I've attached a diff file to show all
> of the suggested revisions.  I hope this is a reasonable format
> my suggestions.  Even though such things are minor, getting
> them right is very helpful for accurately expressing the ideas.
>
> Here are some most substantial comments, which are also
> embedded in my revised file:
> /* What about RFC 5568 (FMIP)? */

There is the "..such as.." so I think there is no really need to lost 
all possible MIP6 variations.

> "Routing based proposals must not propagate routing
>           updates outside the IGP routing domain."
> /* Does this disallow Binding Update? */

Should not.. if you refer to MIP style tunnel management binding updates.

> /* What does "eventually" mean?? */

erm.. removed..

>
> Also, the suggested dates for chartered work items seem
> quite unrealistic to me.

;-) +3 months?


> I noticed that part of the charter fit nicely in my 80-column
> (vi) text window, and part of the charter does not fit nicely.
> I could also fix that if desired.

Fixed.

- Jouni

>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
>