Re: draft charter text updates in github..

Hi,

6/14/2014 7:34 AM, Hidetoshi Yokota kirjoitti:
> Hi Jouni and all,
>
> Thanks for updating the charter, which is much tidy now.
>
> Sorry for my late response, but I have a couple of comments below:
>
> o With regard to enhanced mobility anchoring (mid-session anchor
> switching), there were a lot of discussions in the past as you know and
> eventually that idea was not fully accepted by the community. It's ok to
> handle it in DMM WG, but we also need convincing use cases and
> effectiveness. Re-anchoring LMAs/HAs with preserving IP address may not
> be so elegant and efficient.

Right. The charter does not enforce preserving the IP during the switch, 
actually. It would be a desirable feature tough.

> o I was not very sure why virtualization needs to be mentioned. There
> might have been some discussion about it, but do we really need it in
> the charter?
>
>        The DMM solutions should not distinguish between physical or
>        virtualised networking functions. However, whenever applicable,
>        clarifications for specific networking function deployment models
>        are in scope and encouraged.

I still keep it for the time being. Several folk seem to think it needs 
to be mentioned..

> o The fourth paragraph mentions
> UP/CP separation, but the last sentence is about IP address change,
> which is described in the fifth paragraph. That sentence may be fit there.
>
>        In contrast to existing IETF standard IP mobility protocols,
>        mobility management signalling paths and end user traffic
>        forwarding paths may differ; those mobility related functions may
>        be located in separate network nodes. "Solutions may also specify
>        the selection between the care-of addresses and home
>        address(es)/prefix(es) for different application use cases".

Ack. Done.

- Jouni

>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Hidetoshi Yokota
>
> KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc.
> e-mail:[email protected]
>
>
>
>
> (2014/06/13 20:41), Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> New update (v9) available. I added most of the editorials from Charlie
>> (thanks) and the red texts from Alper.
>>
>> The lot debated anchoring term (and milestone) is still there. The
>> milestone does not mention anymore about preserving the mobility
>> sessions and stuff. That would be up to the solution to define.
>>
>> - Jouni
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 6/6/2014 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Minor changes..
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution
>>> from legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-)
>>>
>>> I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals
>>> received from others.
>>>
>>> - Jouni
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>