Re: draft charter text updates in github..

Fred,

6/16/2014 5:59 PM, Templin, Fred L kirjoitti:
> Hi Jouni,
>
> What about operation in IPv4-only access networks? There may be
> many enterprise networks that offer IPv4-only in their access
> networks for the near future, but with IPv6 enabled internally.
> For them, we should be able to tunnel IPv6 inside IPv4 if the
> mechanism can support it.

My personal view is still that IPv4-only access is even more past than 
"anchoring" ;-)

Anyway, if there is (rough) consensus in the WG for the below new text, 
so be it.

- Jouni


>
> Here is my suggested re-word:
>
> OLD:
> DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 deployments and
> should not be required to support IPv4, specifically in situations
> where private IPv4 addresses and/or NATs are used. IPv6 is
> assumed to be present in both the mobile host/router and the
> access networks.
>
> NEW:
> DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 mobile hosts/routers
> and should not be required to support IPv4-only mobiles. Access
> networks may be IPv6-enabled or IPv4-only, but with IPv6 enabled
> in the network core.
>
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
>> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 4:20 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Another set of tweaks in github (v12):
>>    o reminders of Charlie's comments
>>    o Hidetoshi's comments
>>    o Georgios' comments
>>
>> Also milestones got postponed. There is still a bit of my own editing in
>> the text so not everything got moved over letter by letter.
>>
>> - Jouni
>>
>>
>>
>> 6/13/2014 2:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> New update (v9) available. I added most of the editorials from Charlie
>>> (thanks) and the red texts from Alper.
>>>
>>> The lot debated anchoring term (and milestone) is still there. The
>>> milestone does not mention anymore about preserving the mobility
>>> sessions and stuff. That would be up to the solution to define.
>>>
>>> - Jouni
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 6/6/2014 2:47 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Minor changes..
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter/blob/master/recharter_draft.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IMHO..the charter as it is today, would allow pretty much any solution
>>>> from legacy anchoring to herd of pigeons carrying IP.. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I have put in editorial changes of my own and clear text proposals
>>>> received from others.
>>>>
>>>> - Jouni
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm