Re: draft charter text updates in github..

"Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983183048EC10@XCH-BLV-512.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Hi Brian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:43 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> On 6/18/14 11:25 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > Hi Jouni,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:00 AM
> >> To: Templin, Fred L; [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
> >>
> >> Fred,
> >>
> >> It is true IPv4 is there (and will be for a long time). Although the
> >> charter does emphasize IPv6 as the base solution it does not prohibit
> >> adding IPv4 support. It is just we can accept an IPv6-only solution as a
> >> valid & complete solution from DMM point of view.
> >
> > However, a solution that works equally well whether the access networks
> > are IPv6-only, dual-stack, or IPv4-only has clear advantages in terms
> > of near-term deployment in real networks. Therefore, I think the charter
> > is currently saying _too much_. My new proposal is simply to strike the
> > following two sentences:
> >
> >   "DMM solutions are primarily targeted at IPv6 deployments and
> >    should not be required to support IPv4, specifically in situations
> >    where private IPv4 addresses and/or NATs are used.  IPv6 is
> >    assumed to be present in both the mobile host/router and the
> >    access networks."
> >
> 
> The above has been a part of the DMM charter for a long time.  Taking it
> out would appear to be opening the door for IPv4-only solutions.

IPv4-only solutions is not my intended meaning. I agree that the
mobile hosts/routers should only support IPv6 applications (and
not IPv4 apps) but that support can be enabled over either IPv6
or IPv4 access networks through tunneling. 

> My
> assessment of the winds within the community is that people are not
> interested in new protocols for IPv4.

No, this is not a new protocol for IPv4. It is IPv6 Neighbor
Discovery over tunnels over either IPv6 or IPv4 access networks.

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]

> Just my opinion...
> 
> Brian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.