Re: demand for DMM traffic steering
Alper Yegin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sri, I was asking about that for the sake of getting all of the details (or following the discussion better). > HoA to COA binding change (EID to Locator mapping) should not be looked at as gateway relocation. > Unless we move the address across anchors by updating the routing infrastructure, there is never > a DPA migration. The moment we talk about Locator, it implies we have access DPA and home DPA, > and change of access DPA is not relocation, its only a state change on the home DPA. So, in your terminology MAG is a access DPA and LMA is a home DPA, right? And as such, both MAG and LMA are called "anchors". Calling MAG an anchor may come as a surprise to some people. We need to nail down the terminology. Alper On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > Alper – That can be fixed. > > > Sri > > From: Alper Yegin <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, July 12, 2014 12:36 AM > To: Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]> > Cc: Marco Liebsch <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DMM] demand for DMM traffic steering > > Sri and Marco, > > Is any of what you are describing captured in the existing drafts? If so, please provide the pointers. > > Alper > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm