Re: WG adoption (was Re: DMM solution space)

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CFED5F60.14EE14%[email protected]>
I'm in favor of this approach. This was my suggestion as well in the past
(when we presented prefix coloring spec) to move forward some documents.
But, those should be documents which are considered common across multiple
solution approaches. The issue seems to be charter approval.




Sri


On 7/17/14 11:04 AM, "Alper Yegin" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Why? Why not make technical progress at every opportunity?
>This extreme serialization and every step overly stretchingŠ. am I the
>only one having issue with the slow progress?
>
>Alper
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.