Re: demand for DMM traffic steering

I do not know your definition of approach vs solution, but one can argue
DMM itself is about a deployment model and an approach. I always insisted
its less of a protocol work and more about a tying many aspects. So, what
we have been discussing is a solution approach which has the essential
properties of CP/DP separation, aspect of optimized/stateless data plane,
application specific gateway allocations .. etc and that at the end is an
approach for realizing DMM.


Sri






On 7/17/14 10:59 AM, "Alper Yegin" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Intense readingŠ :-) Lot of abstractions, which I can only follow by
>relating to specific solutions.
>
>In my understanding, what Sri is describing is about "how to apply UP/CP
>separation to various DMM solutions".
>In the examples I see a number of DMM solutions defined with UP/CP
>separation using Sri's terminology (e.g., per-flow mobility, access
>network anchoring, host-specific route based solutions, etc).
>
>So, it's not a solution by itself, but it's an approach that can be
>applied to various solution techniques to SDNize them.
>And that indeed has value.
>
>Alper
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>