Re: How to progress DMM (was Re: demand for DMM traffic steering)
Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jouni, 2014/07/19 19:12、Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> のメール： > > Ain't that quite visible from the agenda: > > 1.1) have a look at the re-chartering text that it is roughly > acceptable for everyone in the room. We can even do some > minor online editing if there is something that requires > immediate attention. The text has not been changed since > 14th Jun. It seems a bit late to comment on the text. The charter text looks fine but I have one comment on para 3: "Routing based proposals must not propagate routing updates outside the IGP routing domain." That sounds pretty old-fashion operation because even in an operator's domain we uses multiple ASes that independent each other in IGP point of view. So I suggest that using a word of "administrative domain" defined in RFC3753, instead of using "IGP routing domain", such like: "Routing based proposals must not propagate routing updates outside the administrative domain." > > 1.2) have the initial discussion how to proceed after IETF90. > > 2) lenghty powerpoint marathon.. of many I-Ds that we have > already heard a presentation before, so concentrate on > possible updates and how the I-D fits under the current > re-charter milestones. > Ack. > 3) on Friday conclude the next steps and the working procedues > for carrying out the stuff. Decision making point here. (we > probably need to add some minutes for the concluding > discussions, so the longer presentations slots are subject > to some adjustment) > Maybe I have limited time for Friday discussion due to my flight schedule... --satoru _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm