Re: IETF#90 DMM agenda update

Hi Brian,


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Brian Haberman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/22/14 10:49 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> The agenda has been slightly updated (shuffling around the slots and
>> arranging more time to the charter/next steps discussion). Some
>> presenters are affected slightly (-5 minutes). see
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/agenda/agenda-90-dmm
>>
>> Regarding the re-chartering and the next steps. We have a tight deadline
>> to meet if we want to ship the new charter text to the next IESG
>> telechat. Brian will reveal the gory details of the expected
>> re-chartering process and timelines.
>>
>> We are also supposed to come up (again) with a rought agreement of the
>> deployment architecture(s) that DMM "functional elements" map into.

Sorry but I don't understand why we have to work on deployment architectures?

I don't remember any such work before in IP mobility. Is there any RFC
that can educate me on this?

I understand that some architecture work is needed. As far as I know
almost all solution drafts have an architecture.
Wouldn't that be enough?

Kind regards,

Behcet

>This
>> will be discussed as a part of the re-chartering slot and recapping the
>> discussions we had earlier.
>>
>> We are also supposed to come up with a rough agreement how to progress
>> from now on. This could mean (note the conditionality here) a series of
>> interim meetings and setting up small groups (or design teams) to work
>> on the initial set of the solution space drafts. We need to step out of
>> the "progress every second IETF meeting" mode ;)
>
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings.html
>
>>
>> Also keep in mind that the start of the new work poses some
>> serialization whether we want or now: first stabilize charter & reach
>> rough consensus on the deployment models/functional elements. These can
>> be done in parallel. Note that rough consensus does not mean a ready
>> spec or spec at all. Second execute with the solutions space.. the
>> deployment models work might benefit from having a slight heads up
>> before other drafts. These can be done in parallel, though. As a
>> reminder, the charter may change on the route before it gets approved
>> but we can do the opportunistic thing and start working as if the
>> charter were already "approved" when the WG ships it.
>>
>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>