Re: IETF#90 DMM agenda update
Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC8QAcdfDPQSU+XvJywO5DKwEnE_aCZ_1P__LVi_QkgeR2bjTA__9665.11869705773$1406048687$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you are mixing the topics here. I am not sure who? How can you talk about deployment without having a solution? Deployment where? > > Any case, I don't have plans to write one .. I know that and that's why I kept asking, just in case you might change your mind. Maybe you can write a draft evaluating existing proposals from your "architecture" and your "deployment" point of view. Behcet > > > Sri > > > > On 7/22/14 9:56 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>You are talking about Gateway Initiated DS-Lite (RFC 6674). >> >>That is a solution based on DS-Lite, i.e. a variation of DS-Lite or RFC >>6333. >> >>Again, my plea to you, please come up with your draft and let WG see >>what you propose. >> >>That is the right way to go. >> >>Behcet >