Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Just for clarification...

On 9/3/14 12:22 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> 
> I am also concerned on the time DMM is taking on dressing up the
> charter text. I remind you on what Jari Arkko who is founding AD for
> DMM said in Toronto admin plenary:
> WGs should have  solution work from day 1.

Not "should", but rather "could".  Not all WGs need to have
requirements, frameworks, architecture, etc. That is why this type of
discussion during charter development is important.

> 
> He also emphasized importance of running code.

Running code is good thing.  So is an understanding of customer needs
(in this case, other SDOs).

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 536 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUB0I1AAoJEBOZRqCi7goqa3QH+wa/ypuXEGRSKSG5HvdIU3yz
iEKYDfPEyX+ucrBAEilkvG2WGQV0B+hQuczdm5e4jWib4murDLwYSHV77+5ObquO
SlKUdtgC/Lu+vj0/JuqxS+Z7Xk3jQ5M7oOOQdOgTwcw3v4oAHUl7ksf1eFUNqM2o
CKamQkr1oEdpLvTPdVwqqJPhtu1dbPQOQjvuY5zD8Ng1FYEKhCZK0gzNVINOBb4A
TOpcCJYwRZwE5lHQuT4dpd38ToMyY2P+75DtNwg0gt65V0egNne32oEguM4kEtzg
vxovsOlmRN8Lm/zBi0V7FfUL5kiywtKr1yGJulUM2c0Qj1seLhInbVuT1tLaVXM=
=uRMx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.