Re: regarding the re-chartering..
Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just for clarification... On 9/3/14 12:22 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > > I am also concerned on the time DMM is taking on dressing up the > charter text. I remind you on what Jari Arkko who is founding AD for > DMM said in Toronto admin plenary: > WGs should have solution work from day 1. Not "should", but rather "could". Not all WGs need to have requirements, frameworks, architecture, etc. That is why this type of discussion during charter development is important. > > He also emphasized importance of running code. Running code is good thing. So is an understanding of customer needs (in this case, other SDOs). Regards, Brian _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 536 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUB0I1AAoJEBOZRqCi7goqa3QH+wa/ypuXEGRSKSG5HvdIU3yz iEKYDfPEyX+ucrBAEilkvG2WGQV0B+hQuczdm5e4jWib4murDLwYSHV77+5ObquO SlKUdtgC/Lu+vj0/JuqxS+Z7Xk3jQ5M7oOOQdOgTwcw3v4oAHUl7ksf1eFUNqM2o CKamQkr1oEdpLvTPdVwqqJPhtu1dbPQOQjvuY5zD8Ng1FYEKhCZK0gzNVINOBb4A TOpcCJYwRZwE5lHQuT4dpd38ToMyY2P+75DtNwg0gt65V0egNne32oEguM4kEtzg vxovsOlmRN8Lm/zBi0V7FfUL5kiywtKr1yGJulUM2c0Qj1seLhInbVuT1tLaVXM= =uRMx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----