Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Hi Brian,

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Brian Haberman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Just for clarification...
>
> On 9/3/14 12:22 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>
>>
>> I am also concerned on the time DMM is taking on dressing up the
>> charter text. I remind you on what Jari Arkko who is founding AD for
>> DMM said in Toronto admin plenary:
>> WGs should have  solution work from day 1.
>
> Not "should", but rather "could".  Not all WGs need to have
> requirements, frameworks, architecture, etc. That is why this type of
> discussion during charter development is important.

Here is the quote:
WGs should have solution work from day 1

from page 22 of Jari's slides at:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-iesg-opsplenary-7.pdf

BTW we already did the requirements and gap analysis, etc. The
architecture in our case is defined elsewhere, like 3GPP and everybody
in this group is familiar with 3GPP architecture.


>
>>
>> He also emphasized importance of running code.
>
> Running code is good thing.  So is an understanding of customer needs
> (in this case, other SDOs).

Absolutely.

Regards,

Behcet
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>