Re: regarding the re-chartering..
Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 04/09/2014 12:31, Jouni a écrit : [...] >> In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a >> hard-rooted disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile >> IP - and the deployments. We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments >> (2G/3G/4G) do not use (P)Mobile IP. We also know that 3GPP specs >> do mention Mobile IP. To such a point that I wonder whether 3GPP >> has not the same disconnect as here. > > There are LTE deployments using PMIP. Nation wide even. While not > hugely popular, there are still serious commercial deployments. Jouni, I would truly appreciate to stand corrected because it would be a good example to tell other customers about the technology. But I am afraid that what you are saying is part of: the trials, the projects, the kernel code and not least the slideware attracting real customers. The nation-wide LTE IPv6 trial I am familiar with does not use PMIPv6. Alex > >> On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is >> used - the trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the >> slideware attracting real customers. >> >> The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect. > > DMM solutions are not predefined to be a (P)MIP extensions. > > - Jouni > >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list >> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > >