Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Hi Charlie,

Check this out:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-dmm-for-wifi-00.txt

Regards,

Behcet

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Charles E. Perkins
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I have asked this same question many times, in different words...
>
> Namely, if we design a solution that fits the requirements, and bridges
> the gaps as analyzed in the gap analysis document, have we succeeded?
>
> Or, is there a requirement for the work to be adopted by 3GPP?
>
> What if we design for IEEE 802 Wireless, which is currently carrying the
> preponderance of the world's wireless data, and will almost assuredly
> continue to carry a greater proportion?
>
> Regards
> Charlie P.
>
>
>
> On 9/4/2014 3:14 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ....
>>
>>
>> In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a
>> hard-rooted disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile IP -
>> and the deployments.  We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments
>> (2G/3G/4G) do not use (P)Mobile IP.  We also know that 3GPP specs do
>> mention Mobile IP. To such a point that I wonder whether 3GPP has not
>> the same disconnect as here.
>>
>> On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is used
>> - the trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the
>> slideware attracting real customers.
>>
>> The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm