Re: regarding the re-chartering..

From meeting minutes:

(Jouni) "I suggest that we left the bullet as a work item and we do not have explicit milestone
for it. we can add this milestone when we actually see that there is something meaningful
forming for that document. "


The decision at the meeting was to leave the work item in the charter, but not to associate a specific milestone with it until the WG sees what goes into that document. It was not fully clear what would be in that document, and it's a concern that the rest of the WG documents would be gated by such a document. 
Jouni's above suggestion is a good way forward IMO.

Alper





On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:53 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:

> Behcet,
> 
> On 9/3/14 2:33 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> 
>> You don't seem to understand my points.
> 
> That is quite possible.  Your comment on the list was "I am against any
> deployment work before we decide on a solution..."
> 
> I read that as an objection to having the deployment models work item on
> the agenda.  Please do tell me what I am missing.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm