Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Hi Suresh,

Thanks. That makes sense. Now, I remember that spec/update.

The option name conflict and my search not finding 4283 references threw
me off. Thanks.


> No comments on that one :-)


:)


Regards
Sri




On 9/9/14 10:39 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Sri,
>
>On 09/09/2014 10:11 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
>> This is bit strange. Some thing changed in the IANA Mobile Node
>> Identifier pages.  I assumed the MN Id was defined in RFC4283. How come
>> I see a definition in 5271 as well.
>>
>>
>> Confused. Jouni / Brian ­ Any ideas ? Unless, I've been smoking Š
>
>No comments on that one :-). There are indeed two definitions of the
>MNID types.
>
>The one you originally saw is for the mobility option and is available
>in the mobility parameters registry
>
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xh
>tml#mobility-parameters-5
>
>The second one you saw is for the *ND option* to carry MNID from the
>ICMPv6 parameters registry
>
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml#
>icmpv6-parameters-5
>
>Thanks
>Suresh
>