Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Hi Charlie,

This is good. Thanks.


1.) If EUI-48 and EUI-64 addresses are derived of a 48-bit IEEE 802.2
address, why do we need to two sub-types ? Why not have just one sub-type
for mac based identifiers ?

2.) Sub type value (1) is currently used. Its currently overloaded for
IMSI-NAI (3GPP specs) and generic NAI based identifiers. Given the
definition of new sub-types, we need some text explaining the motivation

3.) Proposed Sub-type value of (2) for IPv6 address. What exactly is this
? Are these CGA-based IPv6 addresses ?




                     New Mobile Node Identifier Types

               +-----------------+------------------------+
               | Identifier Type | Identifier Type Number |
               +-----------------+------------------------+
               | IPv6 Address    | 2                      |
               |                 |                        |
               | IMSI            | 3                      |
               |                 |                        |
               | P-TMSI          | 4                      |
               |                 |                        |
               | EUI-48 address  | 5                      |
               |                 |                        |
               | EUI-64 address  | 6                      |
               |                 |                        |
               | GUTI            | 7                      |
               +-----------------+------------------------+







Regards
Sri
PS: Good to see Vijay back


On 9/9/14 1:28 PM, "Charlie Perkins" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Hello folks,
>
>Here's the last Internet Draft that we did, long ago expired:
>http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-perkins-mext-4283mnids-01.txt
>
>I'll resubmit it with a few updates as a personal draft to dmm.
>
>Regards,
>Charlie P.