Re: regarding the re-chartering..

Hi Marco,


On 9/11/14 9:16 AM, "Marco Liebsch" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Sri, please see inline.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 15:58
>>To: Marco Liebsch; Charlie Perkins; [email protected]
>>Cc: Vijay Devarapalli
>>Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
>>
>>I do not see a reason why multiple MN-Id instances need to be present in
>>a
>>single message ? In my experience, this is strictly a deployment
>>consideration,
>>when to use what type of identifiers.
>
>Then there is no issue and it's the cleanest approach. Multiple IDs
>possible,
>deployment determines which type to use, single MNID present. Done.



Ack. That will have least impact on the existing specs.



Regards
Sri