Re: "A Day in the Life of an Enterprise Mobile Device User"
Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 11/09/2014 00:00, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : > Hi Fred, > > On 9/4/14 7:50 AM, "Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> No, in that "VPN" is cited in the scenario and VPN+Mobile IP are not >>> working well together. >> >> Right - switching between VPN and non-VPN will be important for >> enterprise network mobile device users. > > > I think Alex is referring to the DSMIP and IKEv2 interactions and I don't > believe his point is about switching across VPN and non-VPN modes. > > FWIW, the 3GPP S2b interface allows a mobile node to perform handovers > from 3GPP access (S5/S8) to non-3GPP access (S2b). > > There are other examples of Mobile VPN solutions that are deployed and are > based on Mobile IP protocols. RFC5265 is only one example. Sri - I agree that specifications allow certain handovers. I am not sure what do you mean by Mobile VPN? Mobile IP using a MH-HA tunnel with a VPN-style tunnel? A VPN which changes the source address with a new IKE exchange? These are two different things. In my experience, once I successfully set up a VPN tunnel on a Host computer its Mobile IP implementation will no longer work, and vice-versa; although each one can support mobility ok, independently, to a certain extent. Alex > > > Regards > Sri > > > >