Re: Signaling Message Fragmentation

"Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D26B25__29060.0298824303$1411591906$gmane$org@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Hi Sri,

> I remember the nested NEMO discussions, but at least for mobile network
> use-cases I have not seen any real deployment use-cases for that
> requirement. But, it will be good to have some discussions on that topic.

I am thinking about the case when a mobile router A provides an access
link for a mobile router B, which provides an access link for a mobile
router C, which provides an access link for a mobile router D, etc.
Each mobile router would coordinate with their home networks so that
there would be tunnels-within-tunnels-within-tunnels-etc.

I can think of use cases related to my industry, for example when a
first airplane provides an access link to a second airplane, the second
airplane provides an access link to a third airplane, etc. I think this
might come up also for certain mobile ad-hoc scenarios.

In any case, however, whenever there is a fixed or mobile node connected
to an access link provided by a mobility anchor there is nothing stopping
the node from setting up a tunnel. Then, there will be at least one
tunnel-within-tunnel nesting.

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.