Re: Signaling Message Fragmentation
"Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832D26B25__29060.0298824303$1411591906$gmane$org@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> |
Hi Sri, > I remember the nested NEMO discussions, but at least for mobile network > use-cases I have not seen any real deployment use-cases for that > requirement. But, it will be good to have some discussions on that topic. I am thinking about the case when a mobile router A provides an access link for a mobile router B, which provides an access link for a mobile router C, which provides an access link for a mobile router D, etc. Each mobile router would coordinate with their home networks so that there would be tunnels-within-tunnels-within-tunnels-etc. I can think of use cases related to my industry, for example when a first airplane provides an access link to a second airplane, the second airplane provides an access link to a third airplane, etc. I think this might come up also for certain mobile ad-hoc scenarios. In any case, however, whenever there is a fixed or mobile node connected to an access link provided by a mobility anchor there is nothing stopping the node from setting up a tunnel. Then, there will be at least one tunnel-within-tunnel nesting. Thanks - Fred [email protected]