Re: Going forward with the DMM work items

On 9/26/14 11:14 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> 
> My question is we do that three four solution drafts and some of them
> implemented.
> What do we do with them?

My expectation, as AD, is that the WG will assess the drafts presented
by these teams for adoption.  People's opinion of those drafts should
not be influenced by the fact they were written by a team.

> 
> My advice to those colleagues wishing to lead the design teams is to
> please come up with your own solution and get into the race with
> others.

Race?

> How come they can get the hat of DT lead and produce something and get
> priority over others who worked so hard?

First of all, the chairs are well within their right to appoint DT
leads.  They could have appointed all the other slots on the DT as well,
but chose to ask for volunteers.

I do not see anything in Jouni's note that indicates that a team's
output gets any preferential treatment.  The rules of the IETF prevent that.

To re-enforce Jouni's last sentence...

>> These documents will be equivalent to any individual produced I-D, though.

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUJZLCAAoJEBOZRqCi7goqD38IAIfhLv11jO5fgX4d+PYyIohY
Oh/pToqbtajsmjaTTYyxV2lahB9HmEA8jhNgM08jy0qoHtat9LtWpAZOA36g/MaU
LqTgjLy3vFfDLw+o9l2b44m8yO2c9UkCTueJWC5zUEln5A2z3qlnasVX60mWcmNi
h8BENnEizp5n2XWCu8Ru1FrYmjf8cMsht28Mfr2ltEiXJ2S/Zj3OTJ/tFRy7bsb7
95Ub7pFCi/lja003AUhuFhNVneQ9vsISrYmBX/lSXzyXAjKN7WWlAYq1ygyIj6O2
UaAzY8lEW+fewOB37fNXGaVnaPUl8mIQu2o4vNHd/ojGwLGYDj/54/WIhNArmhg=
=OksA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----