Re: WG Review: Distributed Mobility Management (dmm)

Alex,

10/8/2014 5:23 PM, Alexandru Petrescu kirjoitti:
> Jouni,
>
> Thank you for the message.
>
> Here are the modifications:
>
> Where the Charter mentions "Mobile IPv6 protocol family (RFC x, y, z)"
> it should also mention RFC 3963 and RFC 5177.

Hmm.. rather that listing all possible Mobile IP related protocols the 
charter text could just have "e.g." in front of the list of RFCs we got 
there at the momemt?

> (these RFCs were mentioned in past versions but disappeared somehow).

Yes, to avoid listing all possible RFCs on this topic.

> Where the Charter says "The working group may decide to extend the
> current milestones based on the new information and knowledge gained
> during working on other documents listed in the initial milestones.
> Possible new documents and milestones must still fit into the overall
> DMM charter scope as outlined above. Milestones:[empty]"
>
> Please clarify that "initial milestones" is "RFC 4888, RFC 4889,
> draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-08").

See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/current/msg01652.html

- Jouni

>
> Alex
>
>
> Le 08/10/2014 15:00, Jouni a écrit :
>> Alex,
>>
>> Do you have a specific change to the text in mind? The charter text
>> uses systematically "mobile host/router" to make sure mobile routers
>> are not forgotten. However, charter also allows solutions that are
>> not specifically tailored to mobile routers.
>>
>> Jouni
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm