Data-Plane anchors in a control-/data-plane separated deyploment

Marco Liebsch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26D91B8DC6B__523.564840159629$1418900633$gmane$org@PALLENE.office.hd>
Folks,

at IETF91 we received the valid comment to converge on a definition of the term 'anchor'.
In the FPSM discussion, we so far distinguished Data-Plane Anchor (DPA), traditionally a downlink encap function,
Data-Plane Node (DPN), which is more located in the access to terminate tunnels, and regular transport nodes.
Another comment was about a scenario where a single flow may traverse multiple DPAs on its way to the
MN.

I'd like to propose and discuss the following:
In a decentralized data-plane and a control-/data-plane separated deployment, I consider it a reasonable
assumption that each of the so far unambiguously named data-plane nodes can take the role of the other.
So, we may solely refer to a single type of function, e.g. Data-Plane Anchor (DPA), which receives policies
from the Control-Plane.

For a certain deployment, it's the Control-Plane that determines the role and associated policies for each involved
DPA.

Data-Plane nodes are agnostic to the role they play in mobility management.
Control-Plane determines the role of each DPA according to the preferred deployment and configures the
policies accordingly.

I think such assumption allows flexible deployment and eases description in our specifications.

I am not good in drawing ASCII, but I gave it a try (for downlink operation only).

Using PMIP6 terms, the middle-DPA in the figure below serves as kind of LMA, left DPA as MAG,
right DPA (one or multiple) may enforce per-host rules for traffic steering.

Would be happy to get your opinion on this proposal.

marco


               +--------------------------+
               |      Control-Plane       |
               +--------------------------+
                |             |         |
                |             |         |
                |             |         |
         \ /    V             V         V
+--+     -o-  +---+         +---+     +---+   +--+
|MN| ---- |---|DPA|<========|DPA|<----|DPA|<--|CN|
+--+      |   +---+         +---+     +---+   +--+
              Rules:       Rules:     Rules:
              Decap,       Encap,     host-route
              Forward      Forward,
                          qos

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.