Re: Call for adoption: draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility-03

Hi DMMers,

I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document in the sense that the
three types of IP addresses are needed.
But the use of the defined APIs is not clear in the context of the existing
source address selection rules defined in RFC 6724, as I had discussed it
with Danny several times. Definitely, it should be reviewed through use
cases study.

Best Regards,
Seil Jeon


-----Original Message-----
From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2015 1:04 AM
To: [email protected]; Jouni; Dapeng Liu;
[email protected]
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility-03

Folks,

This email starts a two week adoption call for the I-D
   draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility-03
to confirm its adoption as a DMM WG document and as a basis for the
technical solution. The call ends April 17th EOB PDT.

Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the
IETF92 meeting we got 10 voices for the adoption and 3 against. we expect at
least the same amount of expressed opinions on the list.

Notice that version -01 of this I-D had an IPR declared to it. See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2309/

- Jouni & Dapeng

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm