Re: Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call
Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5537D364.1010906__7492.71928002617$1429722043$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Le 22/04/2015 18:51, Templin, Fred L a écrit : > Hi Alex, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 12:42 PM >> To: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DMM] Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call >> >> Le 31/03/2015 00:42, Templin, Fred L a écrit : >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:03 >>>> PM To: Jouni Korhonen; [email protected] Subject: Re: [DMM] Mobility >>>> Exposure and Selection WT call >>>> >>>> Le 26/03/2015 13:17, Jouni Korhonen a écrit : >>>>> Alex, >>>>> >>>>> 3/26/2015, 11:00 AM, Alexandru Petrescu kirjoitti: >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>>>> I thought by "fixed" you meant it stays the same wherever the >>>>>>> Host goes (something like the Home Address). >>>>>> >>>>>> Alper - I think a LL address can also be qualified as 'fixed' - >>>>>> it never changes. >>>>> >>>>> Does LL here mean link-local or link-layer? If it is the former >>>>> one, then the above assertion is not correct. >>>> >>>> Link-local. >>>> >>>> And you seem to say a link-local address is not fixed? I think >>>> link-local addresses _are_ fixed set in stone. They are formed >>>> locally without need of help from router. >>> >>> AERO provides a fixed link-local address that is formed from a >>> prefix received by DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (PD). >> >> Fred - but why should this ll prefix be provided by DHCP? Is it of >> variable value? Or is the link-local constant all the time? (in which >> case it could be hardcoded everywhere). > > DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation delegates an IPv6 prefix to the AERO > Client (e.g., 2001:db8:1:2::/64). The Client then constructs an > AERO link-local address from the prefix as fe80::2001:db8:1:2 > (i.e., it embeds the 64-bit prefix from the prefix delegation in > the 64-bit interface identifier of an IPv6 link-local address). Fred, that looks weird. Never saw a prefix to be used as an Interface Identifier. I guess this breaks the DHCP prefix delegation specification. Why does not the DHCPv6 server assign a link-local address altogether (rather than assigning a prefix, to be used as an IID). Alex > Once the prefix delegation and AERO address configuration > are done, they stay fixes as long as the Client remains > associated with the same AERO link. > >>> Once the AERO Client is given a PD (either IPv6 or IPv4) it can form >>> an AERO link-local address that stays the same wherever the Client >>> moves and with no need to perform Duplicate Address Detection (DAD). >>> It makes IPv6 ND simple and seamless. >> >> Is that prefix fe80::/10? > > No, it would be a global IPv6 prefix like 2001:db8:1:2::/64. The AERO link > has an associated AERO Service Prefix (e.g., 2001:db8::/32) from which > longer global IPv6 prefixes are delegated to each Client. The Client then > gets to keep and continually use its prefix delegation as long as it stays > associated with the same AERO link. > > Thanks - Fred > [email protected] > >> Alex >> >>> >>> Thanks - Fred [email protected] >>> >>>> Alex >>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Jouni >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it's hard to disagree with that, no? >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, I guess, I should have referred to the "nomadic" address >>>>>>> to mean the one that is constant, wherever the Host goes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As such, my suggestion is that a "nomadic" address can never >>>>>>> be an RFC7217 address. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In practice that would mean that if you configure an address >>>>>>> to be "nomadic" you must also tell the kernel to not run >>>>>>> RFC7217 on it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But ok, one might think that these two aspects ("nomadic" and >>>>>>> RFC7217) are orthogonal at this point in time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know if it makes sense to request a fixed and >>>>>>>> random-based IP address. But if someone does it, it works. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alper >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - configured by SLAAC, by DHCPv6, by PPP, or >>>>>>>>>>> registered (RFC 6775). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Orthogonal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> E.g. a nomadic address could never be a link-local >>>>>>>>>>> address. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Describe how IP address type information is >>>>>>>>>>>> conveyed from network to MN. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If one designs a protocol to convey address type >>>>>>>>>>> information from the network to the end node, then >>>>>>>>>>> one could also add the other types mentioned above. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> SLAAC could never 'convey' the address type to the >>>>>>>>>>> end-node, because SLAAC is an operation happening >>>>>>>>>>> with as heavy weight from the Server (router) as from >>>>>>>>>>> the Client (Host): the Router decides the prefix but >>>>>>>>>>> the Client decides the Interface ID. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Still, the network can convey the type of IP address to >>>>>>>>>> the host. Also, one can imagine augmenting Router >>>>>>>>>> Solicitation to let the host convey its requested >>>>>>>>>> type. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Address Registration Option of 6lo and BTLE would >>>>>>>>>>> have the Host conveying this information to the >>>>>>>>>>> Router (and not vice-versa). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OK. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alper >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yours, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> WT agreed to use draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility >>>>>>>>>>>> as the baseline for item#1 (the API). A revision of >>>>>>>>>>>> the draft will also include a new section to cover >>>>>>>>>>>> backward compatibility (Danny will provide the >>>>>>>>>>>> draft text). Comments on the draft are welcome. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The next call will be about items #2/#3 (IP >>>>>>>>>>>> address configuration enhancements associated with >>>>>>>>>>>> the API). We intend to schedule that one in about 2 >>>>>>>>>>>> weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alper >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Alper Yegin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> See below for the Webex details. Remember, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> call is on Tue, Feb 10, at 4pm CET. And don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> forget to read the documents in the reading list >>>>>>>>>>>>> prior to the call. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attendees _shall read _the following material >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the call so that we can directly jump to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the discussions: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-dmm-4.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 2. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-dmm-6.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 4. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-dmm-8.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-dmm-mobility-api-02 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Alper >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *DMM - Mobility Exposure and Selection WT* >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday 10 February 2015 16:00 | Europe Time >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Paris, GMT+01:00) | 1 hr 30 min >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Join WebEx meeting* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m1dad9871a277ff2ab142ae8ff4b77ad3> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Meeting number:641 085 326 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meeting password:dmm1911 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Join by phone* *1-877-668-4493* Call-in toll >>>>>>>>>>>>>> free number (US/Canada) *1-650-479-3208* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Call-in toll number (US/Canada) Access code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 641 085 326 Toll-free calling restrictions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Add this meeting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m0855d524ccb7239248d0ce34e19f38c8> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> to your calendar. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can't join the meeting? Contact support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/mc> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please note that this WebEx >>>>>>>>>>>>>> service allows audio and other information sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> during the session to be recorded, which may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discoverable in a legal matter. By joining this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> session, you automatically consent to such >>>>>>>>>>>>>> recordings. If you do not consent to being >>>>>>>>>>>>>> recorded, discuss your concerns with the host >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or do not join the session. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <WebEx_Meeting.ics> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 27, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Alper Yegin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Poll is closed, and majority selected the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> following date for the call: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feb 10, 4pm CET. 1,5hr call. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please mark your calendars. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this call, we'll aim making progress on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I-D for item#1 (an API for source address >>>>>>>>>>>>>> selection). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attendees _shall read _the following material >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the call so that we can directly jump to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the discussions: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-dmm-4.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 2. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-dmm-6.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 4. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-dmm-8.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-dmm-mobility-api-02 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Alper >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 23, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Alper Yegin >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please mark your availability on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following doodle for our next DMM WG Mobility >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exposure and Selection WT call: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://doodle.com/7xgcr8x6cgxnbzur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Register your availability no later than the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end of Monday (Jan 26). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm >>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm >>>>>>>>>>> mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing >>>>>>> list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing >>>>>> list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list >>>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >>> >> > > >