Re: Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call
Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/27/15 11:53 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: >> So, it is not actually a link-local address per the IPv6 Addressing >> Architecture (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.6). > > Just because the AERO address Interface ID is not formed via EUI-64 > does not mean that it is not a link-local address (see RFC7136, which > updates RFC4291). RFC7421 gives further commentary. I am not referring to the IID of the link-local address. I am talking about the 54 bits of zero which immediately follow the FE80::/10 prefix. _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVPmIjAAoJEBOZRqCi7goqG1oH/2qN2n2uufLKVlnFrcYSLck8 4f/yaY4IWGqK3Uy/VQgwnRgPu1ogHy4KYn5Djze8lsxlY63O179jnv/+lfmq61WJ 6EEHwsR8Mp+MhJiIpMO71r4xsmdwTgLWB60m+GOpe42ccN/p6WJsXZmOEEGI19ef yKUjmS1bC4woarAd51Bm/v5AmOt4QCwERKdh1CwsdJNi4A3FcOyt9zQc6sE2djyK GSD4d0y6Sil/7yUORIeCm382nveAVgBT7PIQN96fqlYIkUUUZYBQEhChFFpZXQwd FD5keAwffMGd5S97nYKqQDV7HvYFRNpgfMeC+XynqDcFT818VTKya3e5D7ZPatI= =O5Ek -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----