Re: vepc draft Rev. 04
Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFwJXX6O+WKngm_vd0XwcZKAouYuQ-zPQMD87JGeNa7Yqo+NhQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Bechet-san, Thank you for your question. In step (15), I meant that EPC-E advertises prefix including UE assigned prefixes. For example, in the case of /64 prefixes assigned to UEs from a /56 space, that /56 is advertised by EPC-E to upstream routers. So the advertised route isn't host routes. Depends on configuration policy, but one case is that the source of that advertised /56 route might be statically configured in EPC-E. Regards, --satoru On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matsushima-san, > > I have a question on your draft: > In Sec. 3.2, page 11, you say > In step (15), the EPC-E advertises routes to upstream routers ... > > Are these routes static/host routes? > > Regards, > > Behcet > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm