Re: vepc draft Rev. 04

Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CAFwJXX6O+WKngm_vd0XwcZKAouYuQ-zPQMD87JGeNa7Yqo+NhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bechet-san,

Thank you for your question.
In step (15), I meant that EPC-E advertises prefix including UE assigned
prefixes.

For example, in the case of /64 prefixes assigned to UEs from a /56 space,
that /56
is advertised by EPC-E to upstream routers. So the advertised route isn't
host routes.

Depends on configuration policy, but one case is that the source of that
advertised
/56 route might be statically configured in EPC-E.

Regards,
--satoru



On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  Hi Matsushima-san,
>
> I have a question on your draft:
> In Sec. 3.2, page 11, you say
> In step (15), the EPC-E advertises routes to upstream routers ...
>
> Are these routes static/host routes?
>
> Regards,
>
> Behcet
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.