Re: Call for adoption confirmation:draft-seite-dmm- rg-multihoming-02

"Z.W. Yan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi, all,
+1
I support the adoption of this draft as a WG draft. It is important for the multihoming and flow mobility support.

2015-12-02 



Z.W. Yan 



发件人: Jong-Hyouk Lee 
发送时间: 2015-12-01  00:34:26 
收件人: dmm 
抄送: 
主题: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation:draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 
 
Hi all


I support the adoption of this draft as a WG draft even with the concerns pointed by Mingui. This draft has a merit of the introduction of the generic protocol extension allowing a multihomed MAG to register more than one PCoA to the LMA. It is definitely useful for a multihomed environment. Authors may update this draft to address Mingui’s comments if needed. 


J.

--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University

#email: [email protected]
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon 


On Nov 26, 2015, at 5:00 PM, Mingui Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:


Hi,
 
I remember it was suggested to remove DSL, “Hybrid Access”, etc, and the suggestion was acknowledged. We haven’t seen an updated version yet. It is not ready to be adopted, I think. 
 
I have read the draft. I found the scope greatly shrinked from the 01 to 02. I guess the draft wants to fight through by providing a more generic protocol extension, while awaiting for real use cases. And, Hybrid Access could be treated as a potential use case (Actually, the DSL+LTE scenario is now intentionally inherited from the 00 version as a use case.).  If I guess right, I don’t think it’s a good starting point since it only covers a fragment of a possible solution. Besides the care of addresses, there are many other gaps that have not been touched: per-packet traffic classification and recombination, performance measurement, the bypass requirement, etc. From the draft, we cannot figure out a clear architectural overview. Section 3 doesn’t help much.
 
Hence, I oppose its adoption.
 
Thanks,
Mingui
 
From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:22 AM
To: dmm
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
 
Hello all,
 
In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:
draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02:  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks.
Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.
 
 
Thanks,
------
Best Regards,
Dapeng&Jouni
 
 



-- 

------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.