Re: Progressing draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 08:53 +0000, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> 
> > All other errata I found to be not within the scope of
> > rfc5661sesqui.
> > However, for Verified errata targeting RFC 5661: is there a process
> > for retargeting them to the RFC that rfc5661sesqui will become? If
> > rfc5661sesqui obsoletes RFC 5661, how do implementers find these 
> > errata?
> 
> I looked at what I can do in my interface, and I can unfortunately
> not
> duplicate and change the RFC number. I will contact the RFC-editor to
> see if they can do something in the backend to duplicate a set of
> Erratas to the future RFC. 


The RFC-Editor can duplicate the errata we think are relevant to have
read on RFC5661seqqui when published. So that appear to not be a big
issue. This aspect is something I will bring with me to the discussion
of the proposal by Adam on these limited scope updates. 

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Architecture & Protocols, Ericsson Research
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Torshamnsgatan 23           | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4