Re: If you have implemnted NFSv4.2, please raise your hand

Rick (and the Linux contributors),

I would prefer that we evaluate the needed RFC changes directly before
deciding on whether to update the specifications - as opposed to a blanket
"is it okay".

I am supportive of making the specification changes if, through
implementation, the specification was found to be wrong, difficult to
implement, or a better interpretation was found through implementation.
That is the way it should be; But, we need to consider the changes in some
detail.

And yes, I am very interested to know of other, shipping implementations.

Spencer


On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:41 PM Rick Macklem <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At this time, I am only aware of one NFSv4.2 implementation that has
> shipped
> to users. That one is Linux and deviates from the RFC in several ways.
> (I've been discussing these on [email protected] and can post a
>  summary here, if desired.)
>
> I have a FreeBSD implementation, but it has not shipped to users yet.
>
> Does anyone else have an implementation?
>
> If yes, has it shipped to users yet?
>
> How would you feel about the "spec" changing to agree with what
> Linux has shipped, to minimize future interoperability issues?
>
> rick
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4