Re: State of NFSv4 implementations ( who is active )
"Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nfsv4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Spencer, dCache.org (DESY) has NFSv4.0 and 4.1 with pNFS that heavily used by many research labs around the world. Our server support nfsv41_file and flexfile layouts. We have prototypes for: - xattr - rpc-over-tls Future plans: - v2 server-to-server copy Best regards, Tigran. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "spencer shepler" <[email protected]> > To: "NFSv4" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 7:01:55 AM > Subject: [nfsv4] State of NFSv4 implementations ( who is active ) > As a working group and care taker of the proposed standards within our > purview, I think it would be fruitful to have a collectively working group > view of what implementations are in-market and which are under support only > and which are under active development. > > As we work through various bis work, we need to understand whom to have > contact with within the broader community, who is represented directly > within the working group and which implementations are not. > > The other use of this knowledge is if, big if, our documents move from > proposed standard, they will need implementation reports and this type of > information will be helpful. > > If individuals can self report here for those organizations (or individuals > - Hi, Rick!) that are active, etc., that would be great. If there are > implementations not represented here based on alias membership, please ask > for permission and then post those activities as well. > > Thanks, > Spencer > > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4