Re: State of NFSv4 implementations ( who is active )
Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nfsv4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 2:01 AM, spencer shepler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As a working group and care taker of the proposed standards within our purview, I think it would be fruitful to have a collectively working group view of what implementations are in-market and which are under support only and which are under active development. > > As we work through various bis work, we need to understand whom to have contact with within the broader community, who is represented directly within the working group and which implementations are not. > > The other use of this knowledge is if, big if, our documents move from proposed standard, they will need implementation reports and this type of information will be helpful. > > If individuals can self report here for those organizations (or individuals - Hi, Rick!) that are active, etc., that would be great. If there are implementations not represented here based on alias membership, please ask for permission and then post those activities as well. Bruce and Trond can correct me if I'm wrong: Linux in-kernel NFS client supports: - NFSv2 and NFSv3 on UDP, TCP, and RDMA - NLM/NSM/MNT on UDP and TCP - NFSv4.x family on TCP and RDMA pNFS layout types: File Block / SCSI Flex file Linux in-kernel NFS server supports: - NFSv2 and NFSv3 on UDP, TCP, and RDMA - NLM/NSM/MNT on UDP and TCP - NFSv4.x family on TCP and RDMA pNFS layout types: Block / SCSI -- Chuck Lever _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4