Re: How the NFSv4 working group "meets" - what are the options...
spencer shepler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nfsv4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFt6Bak9uncJh2HPBYqRd77NKQkSY5pyXg8TDrnMbeRurNbA4Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks for the feedback everyone. We will plan for two sessions. I would appreciate it if the WG spend some time in building a draft agenda so that content and schedule can be built. Spencer On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:51 AM Magnus Westerlund < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the below point. > > On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 05:54 -0400, David Noveck wrote: > > Given the current situation of the working group, it would be best if > you or > > Brian or Magnus would make clear to people that we will be meeting in > > Vancouver and that it would be helpful if everyone who wants the working > group > > to continue would participate, preferably in person, but remotely if > > necessary. If we start now, there will be time to deal with scheduling > issues > > including how many sessions to schedule and deciding on priorities for > our > > limited time together. Later on, there will be occasions on which we can > treat > > the question of whether to meet as an open question but not now. Not > meeting > > in Vancouver or failing to take full advantage of this opportunity could > make > > it impossible for the working group to continue. That is the unfortunate > > reality and we have to adapt to it. > > > > Yes, I think the WG really shall meet at IETF 107 in March. I think you can > discuss if the WG should have two sessions also. One for future discussion > and > one focused on resolving specification issues. From my perspective the > NFSv4 WG > is fairly easily to schedule during the IETF meeting as you only need a > smaller > room and have a rather limited conflict list with other WGs. > > > From my perspective the WG can actually have much more meeting. As Ben > said, the > requirements for a virtual interim meeting is very low, A week or two > notice is > all that is needed. > > If the majority of the WG participants anyway are meeting in conjunction > at some > other event, then one can consider if one can arragne a physical interim in > conjunction with that event if you see a need for having these additional > meetings. > > > Cheers > > Magnus Westerlund > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Networks, Ericsson Research > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Torshamnsgatan 23 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4