Re: How the NFSv4 working group "meets" - what are the options...

spencer shepler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nfsv4
Message-ID <CAFt6Bak9uncJh2HPBYqRd77NKQkSY5pyXg8TDrnMbeRurNbA4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the feedback everyone.

We will plan for two sessions.

I would appreciate it if the WG spend some time in building a draft agenda
so that content and schedule can be built.

Spencer


On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:51 AM Magnus Westerlund <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Regarding the below point.
>
> On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 05:54 -0400, David Noveck wrote:
> > Given the current situation of the working group, it would be best if
> you or
> > Brian or Magnus would make clear to people that we will be meeting in
> > Vancouver and that it would be helpful if everyone who wants the working
> group
> > to continue would participate, preferably in person, but remotely if
> > necessary.  If we start now, there will be time to deal with scheduling
> issues
> > including how many sessions to schedule and deciding on priorities for
> our
> > limited time together. Later on, there will be occasions on which we can
> treat
> > the question of whether to meet as an open question but not now. Not
> meeting
> > in Vancouver or failing to take full advantage of this opportunity could
> make
> > it impossible for the working group to continue.  That is the unfortunate
> > reality and we have to adapt to it.
> >
>
> Yes, I think the WG really shall meet at IETF 107 in March. I think you can
> discuss if the WG should have two sessions also. One for future discussion
> and
> one focused on resolving specification issues. From my perspective the
> NFSv4 WG
> is fairly easily to schedule during the IETF meeting as you only need a
> smaller
> room and have a rather limited conflict list with other WGs.
>
>
> From my perspective the WG can actually have much more meeting. As Ben
> said, the
> requirements for a virtual interim meeting is very low, A week or two
> notice is
> all that is needed.
>
> If the majority of the WG participants anyway are meeting in conjunction
> at some
> other event, then one can consider if one can arragne a physical interim in
> conjunction with that event if you see a need for having these additional
> meetings.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Networks, Ericsson Research
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Torshamnsgatan 23           | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.