Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-04

Hi,

Removing the IESG-Secretary and [email protected] address. 


On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 09:55 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Magnus-
> 
> > On Nov 4, 2019, at 9:53 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The issue, is that the draft says Intended Status: Informational. The write-
> > up
> > says standard track (Proposed Standard). Based on the content I think the
> > later
> > is true.
> 
> We intentionally made this an Informational document.

Okay, that is not what the write-up said. Also, it does not read like an
informational document. So, please provide me with the motivation why this
should be published as an informational RFC. What I can see this is an extension
to at least one IETF defined standards track document. I need to understand why
the WG thinks it should be informational. 


Cheers

Magnus Westerlund 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Networks, Ericsson Research
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Torshamnsgatan 23           | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4