Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-04

Magnus,

I did a quick update to the tool and went off the header of the I-D - it is
marked as informational.

As you say, this should be on standards track.  So we have a quick tool
update to do and when Chuck revs his document, he will just update.


On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:56 AM Magnus Westerlund <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Removing the IESG-Secretary and [email protected] address.
>
>
> On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 09:55 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > Hi Magnus-
> >
> > > On Nov 4, 2019, at 9:53 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The issue, is that the draft says Intended Status: Informational. The
> write-
> > > up
> > > says standard track (Proposed Standard). Based on the content I think
> the
> > > later
> > > is true.
> >
> > We intentionally made this an Informational document.
>
> Okay, that is not what the write-up said. Also, it does not read like an
> informational document. So, please provide me with the motivation why this
> should be published as an informational RFC. What I can see this is an
> extension
> to at least one IETF defined standards track document. I need to
> understand why
> the WG thinks it should be informational.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Networks, Ericsson Research
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Torshamnsgatan 23           | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4