Re: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls WGLC is now closed

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:21 PM Chuck Lever <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi-
>
> Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls closed on Friday Dec
> 13.
> I request that the Datatracker recognize completion of Last Call.
>

I'll do that within the next few days, once we have responses from everyone
whose
comments were incorporated.


> Thanks to all who read through the document and posted comments. I've
> collected
> the comments in an updated draft. Here is a diff with rpc-tls-04:
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt&url2=https://chucklever.github.io/i-d-rpc-tls/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt
>
> David, Tom, could you review these changes and let me know if I've
> understood
> and correctly applied your comments?
>
> Tigran, addressing Tom's comments necessitated a change in Section 5.1.1 to
> language that you requested. Please review the changes and let me know if
> there
> is a problem with the new text.
>
> I'm willing to wait until year's end for late comments.


I'm not.   I assume the people who commented can, within a few days, let us
know whether the document is ready to go
..

> If you have anything to
> add, please don't hesitate to speak up.
>

That's very nice of you but I'm not sure how to accommodate late comments
once
WGLC is officially over, especially if I declare document consensus.

I don't see a need to effectively put off the end of WGLC until 12/31.

If people have small edirotial nits, you can incorporate them during  IESG
consideration.

If someone comes up with a stop-the-presses comment, they can raise the
issue during IETF
last call :-(, but I don't expect that to happen.


>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4