Re: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls WGLC is now closed

Hi Chuck,

looks good to me. Just couple of typos:

antecedants -> antecedents
Offloadng -> Offloading
authentictation -> authentication
facilites -> facilities
opportunitic -> opportunistic
'entries is to be considered' -> 'entries are to be considered'?

Thanks for the effort, 
   Tigran.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Lever" <[email protected]>
> To: "Dave Noveck" <[email protected]>, "Tom Talpey" <[email protected]>, "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "NFSv4" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 8:21:47 PM
> Subject: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls WGLC is now closed

> Hi-
> 
> Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls closed on Friday Dec 13.
> I request that the Datatracker recognize completion of Last Call.
> 
> Thanks to all who read through the document and posted comments. I've collected
> the comments in an updated draft. Here is a diff with rpc-tls-04:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt&url2=https://chucklever.github.io/i-d-rpc-tls/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls.txt
> 
> David, Tom, could you review these changes and let me know if I've understood
> and correctly applied your comments?
> 
> Tigran, addressing Tom's comments necessitated a change in Section 5.1.1 to
> language that you requested. Please review the changes and let me know if there
> is a problem with the new text.
> 
> I'm willing to wait until year's end for late comments. If you have anything to
> add, please don't hesitate to speak up.
> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4